Cutting Both Ways

by Mar 2, 2015Culture, Theology3 comments

One big thing I like about presuppositionalism is that it gives me these special gloves—gauntlets, I guess—that I can use in one of two ways. I can throw them down, of course. But I can also catch swords when they’re swung at me. I catch the sword, pull it out of my assailant’s hands, and swing it back. (Now I mean this all metaphorically, and this all usually takes place inside my head. I do not believe we should “repay evil for evil, reviling for reviling.”)

One small example: people will occasionally criticize Christian higher education by saying, “Don’t you think you should let your kids out of the cocoon and let them be challenged and enriched by the alternative viewpoints they’ll find at secular universities?”

I execute my sword-grabbing move and swing back: “Are any secularist parents doing this? Are any of them sending their children to Christian universities?”

Image courtesy of

Image courtesy of

The secularist challenge to Christian Higher Ed implies something that’s partly true, namely that secular universities are a multicultural arena where students will encounter many viewpoints. It is the mark of secularism’s success that few people think that the arena itself has a viewpoint.

But it does. Secularism is a faith—a faith that man can live without faith, that he can get along just fine without any access or appeal to the transcendent order of things. No empirical studies have demonstrated such a thing—and even if they did (or could), we’d still have to believe that empirical studies are the best way to determine large-scale truth claims such as “Secularism provides the best underpinning for human society.” We can’t get by without believing in at least something we can’t see.

Why don’t secularist parents send their kids to Bob Jones University, where they’ll encounter a unified (though not identical everywhere), biblically based viewpoint? Because, among other things, secularist parents don’t want their kids to lose their faith.

Read More 

Review: Abigail Favale on the Genesis of Gender

The Genesis of Gender: A Christian Theory by Abigail Rine Favale My rating: 4 of 5 stars Really excellent. Fascinating personal story: So-called “Christian feminism” is, too often, secular feminism with a light Jesus glaze on top, a cherry-picked biblical garnish....

A Few Quotes from The Genesis of Gender by Abigail Favale

The Genesis of Gender: A Christian Theory by Abigail Rine Favale My rating: 4 of 5 stars Well written, provocatively helpful—provocative because she was schooled in evangelicalism (which makes her like me) and in feminist theory (which makes her not like me)—and is...

Answering a Question about Political Philosophy

A friend asked me for my thinking—and my reading recommendations—on Christian political philosophy. I was pretty frank and open. I don't hold myself up as a master of the topic. I welcome input from others here. What should I read? What should my friend read? My...

Review: The Power Broker, by Robert Caro

Review: The Power Broker, by Robert Caro

The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York by Robert A. Caro My rating: 5 of 5 stars Robert Caro is fascinated by power. He has given his life to exploring how it is gained and kept. And in Robert Moses, the subject of this epic book, power looks like the...

Leave a comment.

  1. Layton Talbert


  2. Mark Ward

    Next up: a secularist version of “Three College Shipwrecks.”

  3. Claudia Anderson

    Well said, and logically argued. Now explain to me why so many Christians are so gullible? Why does the world intrinsically understand what Christians refuse to acknowledge? It’s true about higher education, it’s true about many other things that ought to be self-evident and altogether outside the realm of the debatable. Of course, I think we already know why this is. It’s an ever-present carnal fascination with the things of the world dressed up in spiritual garb to hide it’s true nature. We are ever adept at self-deception.