by Mar 16, 2011Culture, Tech3 comments

I’ve watched the blogosphere morph and grow over time; I think I became a regular blog-reader in 2001 or 2002. (I had a blog then, too, but it didn’t last—mainly because I did not think I had anything worth saying publicly; I wanted to get some education.)

You know people’s (only) criticism of Twitter? “I don’t care what someone had for breakfast this morning!” That used to be a not-uncommon attitude toward blogs. “Why would I want to read someone’s journal?” But I don’t remember that attitude lasting long. People saw that blogs could do something powerful. Only, in the beginning, the people around me at least seemed to think that power was almost wholly destructive. Bloggers were ignorant undergraduates who rushed to post their mean-spirited criticisms of things they didn’t really understand.

But things kept morphing. Blogging had its moment when it was credited with taking down Dan Rather of CBS in 2004. That power was destructive, certainly, but it also showed that blogging could be responsible. Bloggers could and would do investigative legwork that vaunted CBS journalists failed to do. Blogging earned some real cred in the public eye.

And now the New York Times says blogs are morphing again. Or waning. Or both.

Small talk shifted in large part to social networking, said Elisa Camahort Page, co-founder of BlogHer, a women’s blog network. Still, blogs remain a home of more meaty discussions, she said.

“If you’re looking for substantive conversation, you turn to blogs,” Ms. Camahort Page said. “You aren’t going to find it on Facebook, and you aren’t going to find it in 140 characters on Twitter.”

Substantive conversation on blogs? People didn’t think so in 2002. Things have changed.

Here, briefly, is what I think: blogs fitting more or less in my portion of the blogosphere are good for 1) pithy devotional or theological (or linguistic!) points, 2) concise cultural criticism, 3) linking to little-known resources, and 4) an occasional article-length argument. Those I put in no particular order. Some blogs can be places of helpful public discussion. But not many, if you ask me.

Still, I’m happy to get comments. I do sometimes wonder who you all are. It’s true what one lady said in the Times article: “Blogging can be a very lonely occupation; you write out into the abyss.”

Read More 

Interview Book Review

Interview Book Review

Digital Liturgies: Rediscovering Christian Wisdom in an Online Age by Samuel JamesMy rating: 4 of 5 stars Insightful. My “review” this time will consist of the questions I wrote up for an interview I’m doing with the author: My guest today on Logos Live is the only...

A Few Quotes from The Genesis of Gender by Abigail Favale

The Genesis of Gender: A Christian Theory by Abigail Rine Favale My rating: 4 of 5 stars Well written, provocatively helpful—provocative because she was schooled in evangelicalism (which makes her like me) and in feminist theory (which makes her not like me)—and is...

Answering a Question about Political Philosophy

A friend asked me for my thinking—and my reading recommendations—on Christian political philosophy. I was pretty frank and open. I don't hold myself up as a master of the topic. I welcome input from others here. What should I read? What should my friend read? My...

Review: The Power Broker, by Robert Caro

Review: The Power Broker, by Robert Caro

The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York by Robert A. Caro My rating: 5 of 5 stars Robert Caro is fascinated by power. He has given his life to exploring how it is gained and kept. And in Robert Moses, the subject of this epic book, power looks like the...

Leave a comment.

  1. Duncan

    Um, why write a blog to link to little-known resources when you can tweet that?

  2. Wesley Barley

    Oh, I have a much better criticism of Twitter – few, if any of the important things in life can be boiled down to 140 characters. And as for linking to little-known resources, – well, I’ve already got more resources than I can get maximum use out of so there is little chance that I’m going to go running off after another unless you can prove the importance or improvement of this new one. And that will take you more than 140 characters.