by Nov 12, 2014Personal, Worldview7 comments

It’s not a very satisfying revenge, but an authoritative proofer nixed my favorite phrase in a little paragraph I just wrote for my current project at BJU Press, one focused on biblical worldview and the CFR metanarrative. This phrase must see the light of day—or, well…, the murky light of an obscure blog! See if you can guess which phrase it was…

You can only know a pole is bent if you have some idea of what it looked like when it was straight. And that’s why the Creation, Fall, Redemption metanarrative of Scripture is so important. It tells us that every created thing was originally good, and it gives us guidance as to what that good looked like (what we’ve called “creational norms”). This guidance is something other prominent worldviews out there fail to give.

Here are just two examples:

  • Classic secularism (see Government unit) steadfastly refuses to describe what the ideal world would look like (what the pole looks like when it isn’t bent). They point out that different cultures and religions disagree over the shape of the perfect world, and if you try to claim that your view is right, someone else will just come along and offer a different opinion. Then you’ll have a fight on your hands. Better not to talk about the pole.
  • In philosophical materialism, matter is all that exists. Who can say which states of matter are “good” and which are “bad”? They’re just there. They’re just obeying physical laws; they’re not guided by any intelligence. Birthday parties happen, genocide happens. The Big Bang giveth and the Big Bang taketh away. Blessed be the Bang.

But the Bible gives us the power to make moral judgments, in part because it tells us that the world has a structure, and a good one. It isn’t just churchy, religious stuff that can be good (that’s the way other religions tend to view the world). No, the New Testament says that “everything created by God is good” (1 Tim. 4:4). Mere stuff can be good. Not neutral. Good.

Read More 

A Few Quotes from The Genesis of Gender by Abigail Favale

The Genesis of Gender: A Christian Theory by Abigail Rine Favale My rating: 4 of 5 stars Well written, provocatively helpful—provocative because she was schooled in evangelicalism (which makes her like me) and in feminist theory (which makes her not like me)—and is...

Answering a Question about Political Philosophy

A friend asked me for my thinking—and my reading recommendations—on Christian political philosophy. I was pretty frank and open. I don't hold myself up as a master of the topic. I welcome input from others here. What should I read? What should my friend read? My...

The First Thing I Ever Wrote That I Still Have

This is so random, and I don't know who would care—but I just stumbled across the very first document I saved in what ultimately became my Dropbox/Academics folder. It was an exercise I wrote for an English class in high school. I was 16 and 3 mos. What I find...

Leave a comment.

  1. Duncan Johnson

    I’m guessing that this is what got struck: “The Big Bang giveth and the Big Bang taketh away. Blessed be the Bang.”

    I actually used your variant form of this phrase the other day in class: “technology giveth and technology taketh away.” I really like that one, anyway. It captures so well what John Dyer talked about in From the Garden to the City.

  2. bethyada

    Presumably it is not the Big Bang, but the proofer who taketh away.

  3. Layton Talbert

    I’m guessing it’s “Birthday parties happen, genocide happens” (although what should’ve been struck was “Classic Secularists steadfastly refuses to . . . . :).

  4. Mark Ward

    Fixed! Good eye! =)

  5. Dan Olinger

    I suspect it was just the clause “Blessed be the Bang”–perhaps for its sexual implications.

  6. Mark Ward

    Neither confirming nor denying that you’re right, Dr. O., I confess that those implications did not occur to me until after my conversation with the authoritative proofer—and that (whether this is the phrase nixed or no) he or she did not bring up those implications in evaluating the text.

    You can’t always guess accurately what associations will arise in readers’ minds, but I hope the context would be sufficient to preclude that thought from even arising.

  7. Mark Ward

    It’s time to reveal the answer: it was the phrase “Blessed be the Bang” that the authoritative proofer nixed. He or she thought it was sacrilegious.