Lying Liberals

by Apr 14, 2014Culture

carsonI’m super chary about calling people “liars.” How often am I privy to the inner psychology of someone, and so much so that I know they know they’re uttering a falsehood?

But I’m almost ready to join Ross Douthat in calling progressives “liars” when it comes to the contemporary practice of tolerance—the kind on display in Mozilla’s public statement about former CEO Brendan Eich’s resignation, or in Brandeis University’s statement on Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Even given my belief in total depravity, I’d still rather see tolerant-of-everything-but-intolerance progressives as self-deceived. But when academic acknowledgments of the fact of universal tribalism are repeatedly followed by self-exemptions, it’s hard to believe that no liberal elites ever realize they’re speaking out of both sides of their mouths.

Here’s Douthat:

I am (or try to be) a partisan of pluralism, which requires respecting Mozilla’s right to have a C.E.O. whose politics fit the climate of Silicon Valley, and Brandeis’s right to rescind degrees as it sees fit, and Harvard’s freedom to be essentially a two-worldview community, with a campus shared uneasily by progressives and corporate neoliberals, and a small corner reserved for token reactionary cranks.

But this respect is difficult to maintain when these institutions will not admit that this is what is going on. Instead, we have the pretense of universality — the insistence that the post-Eich Mozilla is open to all ideas, the invocations of the “spirit of free expression” from a school that’s kicking a controversial speaker off the stage.

And with the pretense, increasingly, comes a dismissive attitude toward those institutions—mostly religious—that do acknowledge their own dogmas and commitments, and ask for the freedom to embody them and live them out.

It would be a far, far better thing if Harvard and Brandeis and Mozilla would simply say, explicitly, that they are as ideologically progressive as Notre Dame is Catholic or B. Y.U. is Mormon or Chick-fil-A is evangelical, and that they intend to run their institution according to those lights.

I can live with the progressivism. It’s the lying that gets toxic.

I’m not sure I’m a partisan of pluralism (though my current thinking is that if Christ’s kingdom doesn’t advance with the sword, pluralism is what you’re left with), but you’ve just got to read Douthat’s whole piece.

Read More 

A Few Quotes from The Genesis of Gender by Abigail Favale

The Genesis of Gender: A Christian Theory by Abigail Rine Favale My rating: 4 of 5 stars Well written, provocatively helpful—provocative because she was schooled in evangelicalism (which makes her like me) and in feminist theory (which makes her not like me)—and is...

Answering a Question about Political Philosophy

A friend asked me for my thinking—and my reading recommendations—on Christian political philosophy. I was pretty frank and open. I don't hold myself up as a master of the topic. I welcome input from others here. What should I read? What should my friend read? My...

Review: The Power Broker, by Robert Caro

Review: The Power Broker, by Robert Caro

The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York by Robert A. Caro My rating: 5 of 5 stars Robert Caro is fascinated by power. He has given his life to exploring how it is gained and kept. And in Robert Moses, the subject of this epic book, power looks like the...

Leave a comment.