All the elements of page and book design can be thought of as punctuation, even if some of them are not intended to have any effect on the reading. Verse division, for instance, is a reference system, yet it exerts a strong influence on how the text is read.
—David Norton, A Textual History of the King James Bible
My students are ... disproportionately unchurched (and unsynagogued and unmosqued). An astonishing number of them—15 out of 38 in the last class I asked—come to college having never set foot inside a house of worship. Despite the fact that they are extraordinarily...
Not the most exciting post for my readership, perhaps, but you two could improve any teaching you do if you learned about it: multiple choice questions. My supervisor, Brad Batdorf, Ed.D., recently gave a talk on the subject and gave me permission to share with you...
Outliers: The Story of Success by Malcolm Gladwell My rating: 4 of 5 stars Thoroughly enjoyed this easy read. Gladwell does have quite the knack for finding interesting stories and weaving them into a narrative supporting his thesis. I particularly enjoyed the...
The Psalms as Christian Worship: An Historical Commentary by Bruce K. Waltke My rating: 4 of 5 stars This is a unique commentary, and not just among volumes on the Psalms. It's refreshing to read an erudite volume with careful grammatical-historical exegesis and a...
Leave a comment.
Here I go again, leaving comments on my own posts, but I want to keep these notes together!
Norton also wrote that versification sometimes forced a period into the middle of sentences because the end of a verse feels final, like the end of a sentence (Amos 1:3-4; Acts 21:40 in the 1611 KJV).
Benjamin Blayney in 1769 revised 17th-century punctuation in light of 18th-century standards, stripping out a lot of unnecessary commas (which tend to clutter the text—as in modern German) but otherwise (in Norton’s view) making the punctuation heavier.
A funny comment from Norton: “The only thing sacred about this [KJV] punctuation is that it has not been changed for a quarter of a millennium.” (2:155)
“The practice of starting a new verse on a new line is one of the greatest barriers to a coherent reading of the Bible, splitting the text into small units only for convenience finding references.” (2:158)
Norton also speaks effectively against the use of italics in the text. Most readers simply don’t understand what the italics mean. (2:162)
I sometimes wonder if verse numbers would be best moved to the margin as is common with most ancient works that have similar numbering systems. It would take longer to find verses, but people would be forced to read some of the context in the process.