Richard Gaffin 32 Years Ago on Systematic Theology

by Jul 11, 2008Uncategorized1 comment

Another blogger just recommended to me two articles on the relationship between Systematic Theology and Biblical Theology. One is by Richard Gaffin, written in the Westminster Theological Journal in 1976 (the other is from 2008 by Vern Poythress).

In it he traces the history of the understanding of Biblical Theology with special focus on Old Princeton and its heirs at Westminster. Let me hit the high points:

  • J.P. Gabler viewed BT as wholly descriptive because he bought into a history/revelation dichotomy. Moving, though, to orthodox scholars…
  • Charles Hodge “conceived of [BT] rather broadly as equivalent to exegesis or exegetical theology.”
  • A.A. Hodge paid it little more attention than Charles.
  • B.B. Warfield makes BT the foundation of ST, but doesn’t spell out the implications.
  • Abraham Kuyper rejected BT as he understands it.
  • Herman Bavinck is “virtually silent” on BT.

This near silence among conservative luminaries of the 19th century left room for destructive critics to claim that evangelical theologians were not paying enough attention to the historical dimension of revelation.

So along came Geerhardus Vos, followed by John Murray, both of whom preferred to call BT “the History of Special Revelation.” One prominent illustration of their approach is that of the organic unity between an acorn and an oak tree. The acorn is perfect, but you cannot understand it unless you know it’s on its way to something. BT makes sure that ST keeps that whole acorn-to-oak (or in our case, Creation-Fall-Redemption) story in mind.

For more on BT and ST, I refer you to two stimulating articles I mentioned in a relatively recent post.

Read More 

A Jot of My Thoughts on My Dissertation, a Decade On

A Jot of My Thoughts on My Dissertation, a Decade On

I basically finished my dissertation a decade ago. Paul’s Positive Religious Affections. It’s available on Kindle and print-on-demand just in case anyone wants it. In it I basically argued that Paul is meant to be a model in his affections and not just in his theology...

Did Evangelical Snowflakes Censor the Bible?

Did Evangelical Snowflakes Censor the Bible?

Salon.com recently published an interview with sociologist Samuel L. Perry titled, “When Evangelical Snowflakes Censor the Bible: The English Standard Version Goes PC.” And I got a reply to all this: Nuh-uh! Let me elaborate that answer, however, because “nuh-uh”...

Review: Small Preaching by Jonathan Pennington

Review: Small Preaching by Jonathan Pennington

Small Preaching: 25 Little Things You Can Do Now to Become a Better Preacher, by Jonathan Pennington (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2021). Very few pp.Great little title. Punchy and short. Genuinely full of wisdom. The three things that stood out to me most: The very...

Leave a comment.

1 Comment
  1. bcollins

    I Gaffin’s comment about Bavinck very interesting. Gaffin knows far more about Bavinck than I do, but when I read the section in Reformed Dogmatics on Christology, it seemed to me that Bavinck begins by doing BT–tracing the development of Christology through the testaments. Only after what seemed to be a BT survey did he turn to the questions of historical theology and philosophy. In other words, at least in his section on Christology, it seemed to me that Bavinck was doing a good job of integrating BT into his ST.

    Reply

Leave a Reply