Which Commentary Set Should I Buy?

by Jan 4, 2011Books, Exegesis, NTScholarship1 comment

If you’ve never used BestCommentaries.com, you’re in for a treat. You can search for commentaries by book, by set, and by author. I find myself most often searching by book, because on the Romans page, for instance, all the commentaries will be ranked by an aggregate of recommenders.

John Dyer, the man who runs the site, has done an excellent job with it. And he recently (I think) added a chart showing how commentary sets stack up against one another. It will help you understand this post if you look at that chart first. But here’s a snippet:


I realized that with a little Excel wizardry, I could come up with an average score for each commentary set he lists. A low score means that a given set had more top-rated commentaries. Here are the top seven (the bolded ones are part of the Logos Platinum package):

New International Comm. OT/NT 2.5
Pillar NT Comm. 4.4
Baker Exegtical NT Comm. 5.1
Word Biblical Comm. 5.3
NIV Application Comm. 5.5
Tyndale NT/OT Comm. 5.5
New American Comm. 6

I have all of these in Logos except for Tyndale (I have most of the books in analog form, and they’re for sale so I can get the electronic versions) and NIVAC. I use them all, and I agree with these rankings.

The rest of the list is as follows (those bolded are evangelical; the others are predominantly liberal):

Anchor Bible 8.4
Hermeneia 10
International Critical Comm. 10.1
Expositor’s Bible Comm. 10.5
NT Library 11.5
New Century Bible Comm. 12.6
Continental Commentary 12.7
New International Bible Comm. NT 13.4
Abingdon NT Comm. 14.9

There are many other commentary sets, but a jury of your peers (and of those none of us could hope to be peers with) has tended to coalesce around these as responsible and useful.

Note that some of them, such as the Word Biblical Commentary, have a high number of liberal works. I wouldn’t make the WBC my first purchase.

But if you can get the Logos Platinum package and then save up the thousand or so bucks for the NICOT/NICNT, you’ll have four of the top seven—plus one set that should be on that list, the NIGTC; and one worth checking if you have it, Hendriksen and Kistemaker’s BNTC.

If you get physical books instead, you can just pick and choose the best available commentaries. I haven’t done the math to figure out how you’d be better off. But I prefer having my commentaries in Logos. Reference work like these are the kind of books I don’t mind reading on a computer screen.

Read More 

Review: Comanche Empire

The Comanche Empire by Pekka Hämäläinen This excellent book does what modern history is supposed to do nowadays: it gives a voice to the voiceless and the marginalized; it gives agency to the victims. And yet you can’t always predict what will happen when you go...

Review: Means of Ascent

Means of Ascent by Robert A. CaroMy rating: 5 of 5 stars This book is positively monumental. How does Caro do it? Well, I know how he does it. I read his book on the topic. He does it with a lot of hard and humble work (and some excellent help from his wife). I was...

Review: Think Again by Stanley Fish

Think Again: Contrarian Reflections on Life, Culture, Politics, Religion, Law, and Education by Stanley FishMy rating: 5 of 5 stars I have read multiple Stanley Fish books; I read quite a number of these columns when they were originally published in the New York...

Review: Why I Preach from the Received Text

Review: Why I Preach from the Received Text

Why I Preach from the Received Text is an anthology of personal testimonies more than it is a collection of careful arguments. It is not intended to be academic, and I see nothing necessarily wrong with that. But it does make countless properly academic claims, and...

Leave a comment.

1 Comment
  1. Javier Caballero

    Thanks for the tip!! It is always tough to decide which way to go with commentaries when on a tight budget. This resource is a treat!!