Righteousness and True Healthiness

by Dec 31, 2009Books, ChurchLife, Exegesis, NTScholarship1 comment

James Barr in the iconoclastic The Semantics of Biblical Language:

A regular church-goer is likely sooner or later to hear an interpretation of the word “holy,” which is of course frequent in the English Bible, as “basically” or “originally” or “properly” meaning “healthy, sound.” Those alarmed by the suggestion of superhuman religious effort in the exhortation to “be holy” may thus be comforted, because what is being asked of them is simply the basic “healthiness” or “soundness” which no one would want to be without. All this is based on one fact or alleged fact: the words “holy” and “whole” or “healthy” are etymologically connected; they “come from the same root.” ¶ The fact that “holy” and “healthy” are etymologically “connected” does not mean, however, that they now mean the same thing, or indeed that they ever did mean the same thing. p.111

. . . .

The test of explanations of words is by their contexts. Supposing anyone to become convinced that “holy” in the English Bible really means something like “healthy, whole,” he will find in his reading of the Bible many contexts where this sense produces sore difficulty. He may find it possible to understand the Third Person of the Trinity as “the Healthy Spirit,” but he will have difficulty with those inanimate objects such as valuables gained by capture which are specially devoted to the divine possession and are thus apparently “healthy to the Lord”; and he will surely find it impossible to suppose that the rear chamber of the Temple usually called “the Holy of Holies” is in fact a space specially healthy. p.113

Yes, the Healthy of Healthies. Ah, those Brits.

I’m sometimes a bit depressed reading things like this. Errors like these are so prevalent—are Protestant pastors unknowingly fleecing their flocks? But Barr makes one comment that eases me a bit: one of the reasons that linguistic mistakes like this go undetected is that pastors are, in fact, using them to preach truths found in the Bible—just not in the portion of it where they happen to be grazing their flocks. That is a serious problem, but it is better for the sheep to get grass clippings from another part of the field than tares from the enemy’s field.

Read More 

Review: Small Preaching by Jonathan Pennington

Review: Small Preaching by Jonathan Pennington

Small Preaching: 25 Little Things You Can Do Now to Become a Better Preacher, by Jonathan Pennington (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2021). Very few pp.Great little title. Punchy and short. Genuinely full of wisdom. The three things that stood out to me most: The very...

THE INCREDI-NASB!!!! More Literal than a Speeding ESV!!!

THE INCREDI-NASB!!!! More Literal than a Speeding ESV!!!

In my other life, I am the editor of Faithlife’s Bible Study Magazine, and one of my first acts as editor was to give myself a column: “Word Nerd: Language and the Bible.” They said I could. I also turn all the columns—plus a few that aren’t in print—into YouTube...

Review: The Inclusive Language Debate by D.A. Carson

Review: The Inclusive Language Debate by D.A. Carson

The Inclusive Language Debate: A Plea for Realism, by D.A. Carson (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1998). Don Carson's prose is elegant, and his pace is perfect. He briskly moves the reader through a narrative of the conflict among evangelical Christians over so-called...

Leave a comment.

1 Comment
  1. Don Johnson

    On this point you should read Wenham on Leviticus. Wholeness is not as light a concept as Barr makes it. Think ‘unblemished’. That is what a whole man is like. Spotless. Whole. Healthy. Holy.

    This is of course more of an OT concept. I think hagios is more to do with ‘separate, distinct, other’ than ‘whole, healthy’, isn’t it (just going off the top of my head — too late at night to look it up.

    Anyway, do some reading of Wenham on this. I think he makes some significant points about holiness that we often miss.

    Don Johnson
    Jerimiah 33.3


Leave a Reply