Jonathan Edwards on the Affections Part 1 of 3

by Aug 16, 2008Uncategorized

“I think it clearly and abundantly evident that true religion lies very much in the affections,” wrote Jonathan Edwards in his classic The Religious Affections (or see a solid modernization here). I’m going to post his ten supporting points for that assertion in three installments. I put the scriptural supporting points in a smaller, lighter font.

I urge you to feed on some of this scriptural meat!

Edwards Goes Right to Scripture

1. “That religion which God requires, and will accept, does not consist in weak, dull, and lifeless wishes, raising us but a little above a state of indifference.” 27 Rom 12:11—Be fervent in spirit. Deut 10:12—What does the Lord require of thee, but to fear the Lord thy God, to walk in all his ways, and to love him, and to serve the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul? Deut 6:4-5 “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your might.” The new covenant includes a new heart: Deut 30:6 And the Lord thy God will circumcise thine heart…to love the Lord thy God with all thy heart.” “True religion is called the power of godliness, in distinction from the external appearances of it” 28: 2 Tim 3:5

Edwards Offers Two Empirical Arguments

2. “The Author of the human nature has not only given affections to men, but has made them very much the spring of men’s actions.” 29 This is true not just in religion but in business and even in sin. “Take away all love and hatred, all hope and fear, all anger, zeal, and affectionate desire, and the world would be in a great measure motionless and dead; there would be no such thing as activity amongst mankind, or any earnest pursuit whatsoever.” 29

3. “The things of religion take hold of men’s souls no further than they affect them.” 30 “In a word, there never was anything considerable brought to pass in the heart or life of any man living, by the things of religion, that had not his heart deeply affected by those things.” 31

Read More 

Three Reasons a Common Argument against KJV-Onlyism Fails

I'm done addressing KJV-Onlyism at the popular level on December 31, 2024 (with a few little exceptions I mention in my wrap-up video), so I'm clearing out my files—and posting a few scripts that never made it to the channel. I’ve heard many people over the years say...

Breaking My Two-Year Silence* on Confessional Bibliology

Breaking My Two-Year Silence* on Confessional Bibliology

 I just broke my two-year silence regarding Confessional Bibliology with a big video on my channel that you don’t want to miss—a discussion with Drs. John Meade and Will Ross about the recent Reformation Bible Society LXX Conference. I think I need to explain why I’m...

Quick Answer to a Question about Complementarianism

Quick Answer to a Question about Complementarianism

A dear friend of mine recently asked me if complementarianism is used to justify sin. I gave this quick answer: Yes. Just as I think egalitarianism can be used to justify sin, including sexual sin. For example, the guy who really thinks his secretary is hot and knows...

Review: Abigail Favale on the Genesis of Gender

The Genesis of Gender: A Christian Theory by Abigail Rine Favale My rating: 4 of 5 stars Really excellent. Fascinating personal story: So-called “Christian feminism” is, too often, secular feminism with a light Jesus glaze on top, a cherry-picked biblical garnish....

Leave a comment.

0 Comments